Go Back   Sportssession Forums > Pro Sports Talk > Everything Pro!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2007, 05:39 AM
JasonBay's Avatar
JasonBay Status: Offline
NFL Pro Bowl
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 849
vCash: 5945
Default Mcgahee on the trading block ?

Quote:
INDIANAPOLIS -- The Buffalo Bills are using part of their time here at the NFL scouting combine this weekend to apprise teams that starting tailback Willis McGahee is available via trade, and it appears they have attracted the interest of at least one potential suitor.

Willis McGahee
Running Back
Buffalo Bills

Profile
2006 SEASON STATISTICS
Rush Yds TD Rec Yds TD
259 990 6 18 156 0


Jerry Reese, the first-year general manager of the New York Giants, acknowledged Saturday morning that his team has some interest in McGahee, a four-year veteran who has twice posted 1,000-yard seasons.


"There is some talk about Willis out there," Reese said. "We'll investigate Willis. We'll investigate everybody out there with trade talks. We'll leave no stones unturned."


The Giants are seeking to bolster a tailback depth chart thinned by the retirement of star Tiki Barber, and where two-year veteran Brandon Jacobs is now the nominal starter. The Giants feel Jacobs has a strong upside, but Barber's former backup has logged just 134 carries in two seasons.


Jacobs carried 96 times for 423 yards in 2006, but he posted double-digit rushing attempts in only three games and will have to demonstrate in camp that he is able to assume the workhorse load that Barber once shouldered. The ideal situation, Reese allowed, would be for Jacobs to win the starting job and for the team to have a complementary back, maybe a veteran, on hand as well.


"We're looking for Brandon to probably carry the ball 20 times and for another running back [to carry] 15 times," Reese said. "[Jacobs] will carry the maximum amount of the load for us, I'm assuming, if everything goes like we expect it to."


In truth, though, McGahee is a more accomplished back than Jacobs, and he certainly would compete hard for the No. 1 job if the Giants acquired him. It is not believed that there have been any substantive trade discussions yet between the Giants and the Bills. But officials from other teams confirmed that the Bills are actively pursuing trade partners for McGahee, the team's first-round choice in the 2003 draft.


Buffalo officials seem to have soured on McGahee, who has not asked to be traded, but who is entering the final year of his contract in 2007. McGahee could depart as a free agent after the 2007 season and the Bills, wary of the possibility he could exit with them getting nothing in return, have taken a active stance in trying to find him a new home.


It is not known if any other teams have indicated an interest in McGahee. The former University of Miami standout has appeared in 46 games, including 40 starts, and carried 868 times for 3,365 yards and 24 touchdowns.


McGahee, 25, missed his entire rookie campaign as he recovered from the catastrophic knee injury that ended his college career, then rushed for over 1,000 yards each in 2004 and 2005, before running for 990 yards last season.


In an unrelated move, the Giants reached agreement with two-year veteran linebacker Chase Blackburn on a four-year, $3.5 million contract. Blackburn is expected to vie for a starting job in the Giants' revamped linebacker corps in 2007.
Personally I think its pretty stupid if they trade him , He's had a productive career behind a bad line. I wonder what they'll get if they do trade him .
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2007, 07:08 PM
slinger2424's Avatar
slinger2424 Status: Offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northern California - USA
Posts: 1,321
vCash: 3613
Default

I wouldnt think they could get alot for him, I might be wrong, but I don't see him being a top dollar / top tier back. I am sure he might be able to but just don't see it with his current numbers.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2007, 10:05 PM
JasonBay's Avatar
JasonBay Status: Offline
NFL Pro Bowl
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 849
vCash: 5945
Default

I think they can get atleast a 2nd , if he goes to the Giants he could have a very good year.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2007, 11:52 PM
bostonwr's Avatar
bostonwr Status: Offline
Rookie of the Year
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 197
vCash: 300
Default

Solid RB's are a dime a dozen, they are the most tradeable players on an NFL roster because there are so many good ones and because they have shorter careers. I don't have a problem with this move as long as they get fair value.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2007, 02:29 AM
JasonBay's Avatar
JasonBay Status: Offline
NFL Pro Bowl
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 849
vCash: 5945
Default

I wouldnt call solid Rb's a dime a dozen by any means. I wonder if they do trade who will they look for in FA or in the draft . Is there any Rb's that are average/solid coming in FA.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2007, 03:50 AM
bostonwr's Avatar
bostonwr Status: Offline
Rookie of the Year
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 197
vCash: 300
Default

I can probably reel off a list 20 names long atleast of capable RB's who can run for 1,000 yds per season. There's a few elite RB's like LT, LJ, and Alexander (when healthy) that you don't part with, but there are plenty of RB's of McGahee's quality in the NFL and they aren't that hard to pick up in the draft either, even in the middle rounds.


RB is the easiest position to fill. It's not like replacing a QB or a LT or a MLB.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2007, 03:51 AM
bostonwr's Avatar
bostonwr Status: Offline
Rookie of the Year
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 197
vCash: 300
Default

I'm really not up to date on what the FA market is looking like this offseason. My guess is that if they traded him they would try and draft a RB to replace him like the Colts did with Edge James last year.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2007, 04:34 AM
Hocks's Avatar
Hocks Status: Offline
Rookie of the Year
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 137
vCash: 4441
Default

I think BostonWR is right on here. RBs can be replaced pretty easily. So I don't think there is anyway that the NYG give a 2nd round pick.

Possible RBs w/o a home.

Micheal Turner (RFA)
A Green (FA)
Dom Rhodes (FA)
Jamal Lewis
MaGahee (maybe on trading block)
T Jones (maybe on trading block)
T Bell (maybe on trading block)
C Brown (FA)
TJ Duckett (FA)
Marcel Shipp (FA)
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2007, 04:45 AM
JasonBay's Avatar
JasonBay Status: Offline
NFL Pro Bowl
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 849
vCash: 5945
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hocks View Post
I think BostonWR is right on here. RBs can be replaced pretty easily. So I don't think there is anyway that the NYG give a 2nd round pick.

Possible RBs w/o a home.

Quote:
Micheal Turner (RFA)- Could be good but has yet to a starter so dont know how that will pan out.
A Green (FA)I thought he got a extension , I may be wrong ... but 30 and production is only waining
Dom Rhodes (FA)Far from solid
Jamal LewisProduction has went south , career going the same place
MaGahee (maybe on trading block)Imagine what he could do with a line
T Jones (maybe on trading block) You could call him solid
T Bell (maybe on trading block)I think product of zone blocking
C Brown (FA)Far from solid
TJ Duckett (FA)Nothing more than a short yard back
Marcel Shipp (FA)
haha , solid ? You typed this without laughing.

Theres my opinions on these guys .
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2007, 12:36 PM
Hocks's Avatar
Hocks Status: Offline
Rookie of the Year
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 137
vCash: 4441
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonBay View Post
Theres my opinions on these guys .
I wasn't saying all of these guys were solid. I was listing the available backs. I guess I kind of put 2 posts into one. I agree w/ all of your grades on these backs except T Jones. I think he is a pretty decent back.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:12 PM.

A vBSkinworks Design

 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=